Learn Philosophy Online with Top-Rated Tutors

GCSE-History, Politics, Religious Studies, Geography A-Level-History, Politics, Philosophy and Ethics. Higher Level-Undergraduate-Anglo-Saxon History. Languages-English and Latin. Preferred Student Age Group-GCSE, A-Level, and mature students. I'm Thomas Gymer, currently a postgraduate student at the University of East Anglia, studying Medieval History. My undergraduate degree was in History and Politics. I have always been interested in teaching, even when I was in school myself, so this is an excellent opportunity to pass on my knowledge and passion for these subjects. Outside of education, I'm a big fan of board games, reading, fencing, and comedy. History and Politics Degree.

Hi, I'm Savannah Stanislaus, I'm 23 years old and I am a recent graduate from the University of Oxford with a BA in German. Over the years, I've tutored a variety of subjects in both individual and group settings, including English at GCSE and A Level, as well as a foreign language, German as a foreign language and A level, Debating and Philosophy A level. My approach to tutoring is one that is personal and based on the individual's goals and learning style, but generally I like to frame the content in a way that feels relatable to what the individual may already be aware of and build from there. Many of my former students have wanted to focus on exams, so I've mastered the ability to interpret exam questions and mark schemes and then frame the demands in a way that is accessible to the student. I have a BA in German from the University of Oxford. My degree was broad and focused not only on the German Language but also on Literature through time, history, medieval German Language, extensive translation, Linguistics, culture and politics in the German-speaking world. My main interests lie in Literature, Linguistics and Philosophy. My dissertation received a first class grade and was Philosophy-based with the title 'Is Ludwig Wittgenstein's distinction between 'Knowledge' and 'Certainty' as a critique of G. E. Moore and the field of philosophical scepticism, worthwhile?’